Oscar Wilde famously wrote that truth is entirely a matter of style:

Art, breaking from the prison-house of realism, will run to greet him, and will kiss his false, beautiful lips, knowing that he alone is in possession of
the great secret of all her manifestations, the secret that Truth
is entirely and absolutely a matter of style; while Life–poor,
probable, uninteresting human life–tired of repeating herself for
the benefit of Mr. Herbert Spencer, scientific historians, and the
compilers of statistics in general, will follow meekly after him,
and try to reproduce, in her own simple and untutored way, some of
the marvels of which he talks.

This reflection, taken from his dialogue The Decay of Lying, dramatizes what I also consider to be art’s most potent effect: that of playing with the absoluteness of truth and perhaps molding what we consider to be reality and/or life in the process. This consideration, of how style can (mis)represent truth, is especially relevant today when we are bombarded with digital information from authors all across the world and across all ideological spectrums. Our ideas of what truths “sound” like must be challenged or we will resort to consuming content in our own personal echo chamber.

Beyond the inherent veracity or lack of veracity in the content we consume, there also lies the possible loss of its relative value. In the book Narrating Space/Spatializing Narrative, mentioned in a previous unit update, the authors argue that “If we don’t find a way to filter out unwanted messages, we will walk in a reality augmented by the fleeting thoughts of every passerby.” This suggests that the digital age requires everyone to be a curator of content.

This new muscle we need to develop is what I want to stimulate with my Dream of a Theatre experience. I want the center of consumption to be self-aware, constantly changing, and unrealistic. I want it to mimic the feeling of walking into a complex relationship between objects, languages, bodies, that has no inherent absolute truth. I want it to be jarring and for it to involve a juxtaposition with big entertainment franchises. I think these blockbusters are a perfect analogy for truth being a matter of style, since below their slick conventions lie, undoubtedly, political and social idealogies. The same is true for any personal blog writer, be it about cosmetics or food, and especially true for journalists. Objectivity is never fully acheived, since the very act of choosing which facts to include involves choosing which not to include.

I don’t think we should aspire to perfect objectivity, perhaps just an awareness of how language can hide as much as it can reveal. More and more we try to appear more systematic, yet we’re trying to mold our data into ways we deem superior to our natural ways of perceiving, all the while being driven by the same initial perception we judged as incorrect or inefficient. Consider this project as a reaction to this sentiment and a celebration of that perceptive feebleness where everything inevitably changes right under our noses.

This past week I spent modeling in TiltBrush, focusing on the mountains that will serve as a backdrop to my theatre screen. I will upload some pictures of what they’re looking like once I have access to the application again.

More considerations: I want to further push the contrast between the enclosed theatre and the open world. There will be some gaps where the user will be able to see trees off in the far distance, giving depth clues. This will further confound the sense of space and give a feeling of unreality.

Challenges for this: not sure how I will mimic the watercolor quality of the water that moves on the screen. There is a petal-like particle system I am considering for the flooding of the theatre, but in order for it to give the sense of flowing water before said event, I would need to place many of them, almost like pixels, along the screen and over the model of the floating character. So many particle systems can be taxing on the system.

I am also playing around with shaders to see if I can place a flat surface with one on top of the screen which will mimic this watercolor horizontal movement. It shouldn’t be too difficult to achieve. Since my time is limited, it may have to wait until after I deliver this project to my course leader. My ambitious objective is to deliver a rough CG animatic. This is not required, so I will not burden myself too much if I can’t meet this goal. We are only required to hand in place-holders in the scenes, and a storyboard done in VR.

I’m happy to see these scenes evolve. Once again, thank you for reading!

Last week I began creating my models in TiltBrush, and this week I imported my first finished model: a movie theater chair.

At first, I had issues with importing the embedded materials and had to add some Unity materials. I don’t know if it was caused by this, but I was using the LWRP. In my new project, I used the 3D template and had no issues with the Poly toolkit.

I began to experiment with a colored pencil shader I found in Unity, in order to achieve a more consistent look. I am happy with the results, and think I will be using this camera filter in my final project.

Here’s what it looks like in motion:

Aaand here is what the scene is looking like at the moment:

I’m excited for the theatre to slowly come together.

In the book Narrating Space/Spatializing Narrative , an impossible space is defined as a place the reader cannot understand; for example, a house that is smaller on the inside than it is on the outside. The impossibility of understanding is “not a matter of missing information but a matter of radical ontological difference (25).”

So what would it mean to place a user in an impossible space? If it’s a matter of ontological difference, then present them with a paradigm that is not only unusual, but with new existing relationships between their parts. I believe my theatre might do this: (1) it is an almost empty, dark place with no conventional entertainment and (2) the relationships set-up will have no reference in the physical world. Characters are doubled, including the protagonist, the screen is the object of observation and less of a passive consumption, and in a more cheeky twist movie posters around the concession stand will poke fun at existing modes of entertainment (MARVEL at U.S. Corporate Values or Token Moody Foreign Film). The idea is for the almost mirror image of this center of consumption to put the original in question and re-imagine relationships between ourselves and ourselves, ourselves and others, and ourselves and art/entertainment.

Another point of departure from a possible space is the painterly aesthetic. All models will be painted in TiltBrush with the bristle brush, that most similar to traditional media. This should give the space an impressionistic feeling that alerts you of the impossibility of what you’re experiencing being “real”. Since the impossibility we’re positing is inherently ontological, this should make the user question definitions of reality and perhaps consider the value of “in-between”, impossible places for a re-shifting of existing paradigms and consequent evolution (or devolution).

Now here’s a feeling worthy of pursuing in VR:
…no matter where we are, we are at a place connected to everywhere else in the world, a place where all roads come together (33).

This is reminiscent of Borges’ Garden of Forking Paths where the narrator discovers his ancestor has written a bifurcating novel:

Naturally, my attention was caught by the sentence, ‘I leave to various future times, but not to all, my garden of forking paths: I had no sooner read this, than I understood. The Garden of Forking Paths was the chaotic novel itself. The phrase ‘to various future times, but not to all’ suggested the image of bifurcating in time, not in space. Rereading the whole work confirmed this theory. In all fiction, when a man is faced with alternatives he chooses one at the expense of the others. In the almost unfathomable Ts’ui Pen, he chooses – simultaneously – all of them. He thus creates various futures, various times which start others that will in their turn branch out and bifurcate in other times. This is the cause of the contradictions in the novel (emphasis my own).

Anything that is impossible ontologically must involve a contradiction. Contradictions are the first sign of evolution: the existence of a former state by that of a present or future state. Contradiction as feeling is not very comfortable, perhaps for the same reason that ontological shifts are not very comfortable. VR could reframe our experiences and possibly create the illusion that every new experience is related to all others–

Then I reflected that all things happen, happen to one, precisely now. Century follows century, and things happen only in the present. There are countless men in the air, on land and at sea, and all that really happens happens to me . . .